The June 2023 Supreme Court decision banning colleges from considering race in admissions is having repercussions beyond who gets into college. The ruling has spurred a wave of state laws that curb or end campus diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts — and race-based scholarships are coming under fire, too. The University of Alabama is one of several schools that has stopped using race as a consideration in some scholarships. However, the school says their “commitment to providing opportunities to all remains unchanged.” Soledad O’Brien Productions and Retro Report produced this documentary short for TIME, in partnership with The Hechinger Report, which also reported this story on how the rolling back of DEI efforts and scholarships is dramatically changing opportunities for students.
ruling
The spokesman for the Association of Local Governments of Nigeria (ALGON), Obiora Orji, has expressed frustration over the delayed implementation of direct payments to local governments.
Several months ago, the Supreme Court ruled that monthly allocations should be paid directly into the accounts of the 774 local government councils, bypassing the joint state-local government accounts managed by the Federation Accounts Allocation Committee (FAAC).
However, four months after the ruling, allocations are still being routed through the joint accounts.
Following the ruling, the Federal Government acknowledged the need to address operational issues before implementing the directive and set a three-month timeline for resolution. This period ended in October, but no progress has been made.
In an interview with Punch, Orji confirmed that the promised direct payments had not yet begun.
“It is what everybody is waiting for. It cannot be hidden, and once the payment is made, everyone will be aware,” Orji said.
Similarly, the National President of the National Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE), Akeem Ambali, attributed the delay to the lack of presidential approval for full local government financial autonomy.
Ambali revealed that NULGE had submitted its position paper to the inter-ministerial committee established by the Federal Government to facilitate the Supreme Court’s directive.
He noted that the committee, chaired by the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Senator George Akume, had concluded its deliberations and submitted a technical report to President Bola Tinubu for final approval.
A New York State judge has put President-elect Donald Trump’s conviction for hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels on hold until at least November 19.
Trump’s former attorney Michael Cohen had paid $130,000 to Daniels to prevent the release of an alleged 2006 affair, which Trump has vehemently denied.
Justice Juan Merchan halted any decision on vacating Trump’s conviction, citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent decision that shields presidents from prosecution over actions related to their official duties.
The delay comes after Trump’s November 5 election win, with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office agreeing to reassess the case after Trump’s defence team requested a review.
Trump was convicted in May of 34 felony counts for falsifying business records to cover up a potential scandal before his 2016 election.
The original sentencing date was set for November 26, but prosecutors now have until November 19 to propose next steps.
(NEW YORK) — A judge postponed a decision on whether to undo President-elect Donald Trump’s conviction in his hush money case, after his lawyers called for freezing and ultimately dismissing the case so he can run the country.
New York Judge Juan M. Merchan had been set to rule Tuesday on their earlier request to throw out his conviction because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling this summer on presidential immunity. Instead, he told Trump’s lawyers Tuesday he’d delay the ruling until Nov. 19.
According to emails filed in court, Trump lawyer Emil Bove asked for the delay over the weekend, arguing that putting the case on hold — and then ending it altogether — is “necessary to avoid unconstitutional impediments to President Trump’s ability to govern.”
Prosecutors agreed to the delay.
Trump won back the White House a week ago but the legal question concerns the Republican’s status as a past president, not an impending one.
A jury convicted Trump in May of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels in 2016. The payout was to buy her silence about claims that she had sex with Trump.
Read More: What Trump’s Win Means for His Legal Cases
He says they didn’t, denies any wrongdoing and maintains the prosecution was a political tactic meant to harm his latest campaign.
Just over a month after the verdict, the Supreme Court ruled that ex-presidents can’t be prosecuted for actions they took in the course of running the country, and prosecutors can’t cite those actions even to bolster a case centered on purely personal conduct.
Trump’s lawyers cited the ruling to argue that the hush money jury got some evidence it shouldn’t have, such as Trump’s presidential financial disclosure form and testimony from some White House aides.
Prosecutors disagreed and said the evidence in question was only “a sliver” of their case.
Trump’s criminal conviction was a first for any ex-president. It left the 78-year-old facing the possibility of punishment ranging from a fine or probation to up to four years in prison.
The case centered on how Trump accounted for reimbursing his personal attorney for the Daniels payment.
The lawyer, Michael Cohen, fronted the money. He later recouped it through a series of payments that Trump’s company logged as legal expenses. Trump, by then in the White House, signed most of the checks himself.
Prosecutors said the designation was meant to cloak the true purpose of the payments and help cover up a broader effort to keep voters from hearing unflattering claims about the Republican during his first campaign.
Trump said that Cohen was legitimately paid for legal services, and that Daniels’ story was suppressed to avoid embarrassing Trump’s family, not to influence the electorate.
Trump was a private citizen — campaigning for president, but neither elected nor sworn in — when Cohen paid Daniels in October 2016. He was president when Cohen was reimbursed, and Cohen testified that they discussed the repayment arrangement in the Oval Office.
Trump has been fighting for months to overturn the verdict and could now seek to leverage his status as president-elect. Although he was tried as a private citizen, his forthcoming return to the White House could propel a court to step in and avoid the unprecedented spectacle of sentencing a former and future president.
While urging Merchan to nix the conviction, Trump also has been trying to move the case to federal court. Before the election, a federal judge repeatedly said no to the move, but Trump has appealed.
Dr. Doyin Okupe, a former Presidential Spokesperson, has stated that he has never dismissed the possibility of President Bola Tinubu securing victory in the upcoming 2027 elections.
Okupe made the remark in a statement on Monday in Lagos, while reacting to some online media reports on his statement regarding 2027 presidential elections.
The former Director-General of Mr Peter Obi Presidential Campaign Council, said that he remained a committed supporter of President Tinubu’s administration.
Okupe said that he strongly believed in Tinubu’s vision to address the current challenges facing Nigeria, which according to him, are inherited from previous governments.
“It has come to our attention that some online blogs, including the Daily Post, published a story attributing a baseless and misleading statement to Dr Doyin Okupe, the former Presidential Spokesman, regarding the 2027 presidential election.
“The article falsely claims that Dr Okupe said the 2027 election would be ‘Game Over’ for President Bola Tinubu, if the North were to field former President Goodluck Jonathan as a candidate.
“We wish to clarify that this story is a complete distortion of Dr Okupe’s words and a deliberate misrepresentation of his views.
“What Dr Okupe actually expressed in a tweet only had to do with those he described as pseudo politicians who lack deep thinking, and assume that a joint ticket between former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Mr Peter Obi or the North fielding Jonathan as a presidential candidate, would defeat President Tinubu, as those thinking in that direction will be dissappointed.
“This statement was made in the context of political strategy,” Okupe explained.
He described the online misrepresentation as a “clear example of media manipulation, designed to misinform the public and sow discord”.
Okupe called on the general public to be cautious of such misleading narratives and to verify information before forming opinions.
“He remains unwavering in his commitment to supporting President Bola Tinubu’s administration and the progress of Nigeria.
“Any attempt to twist his words or intentions will not deter him from continuing to advocate for policies that will help Nigeria thrive.
“We trust that this clarification will put to rest any confusion caused by the Daily Post’s reporting,” he added.
The Labour Party Chairman, Julius Abure, has reacted to the Federal High Court’s ruling affirming his leadership.
According to report the Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday declared Abure as the substantive Chairman of the Labour Party.
The court directed the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC, to acknowledge Abure as the legitimate chairman, contradicting INEC’s previous position that Abure’s leadership was invalid.
In a statement on Tuesday, Abure expressed his gratitude, calling the victory “a triumph for justice and democracy.”
“This victory is not just mine, but a victory for justice and democracy. It confirms that the rule of law prevails and that our party’s leadership remains legitimate.
He further thanked the judiciary, particularly Justice Emeka Nwite, for upholding justice.
“I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to the judiciary, particularly Justice Emeka Nwite, for his courage and integrity in delivering a judgment that upheld justice and resisted external pressure.
“His well-articulated judgement has restored our faith in the judiciary and given us hope for democracy in Nigeria,” the statement read.
Abure stated that he would forgive those who tried to undermine the party and participated in character assassination.
He also urged Peter Obi, the party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 election, to assist in uniting the party.
“I call on Peter Obi, the former Presidential candidate of our party to help unite the party,” he wrote.
The Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Kwara State, has declared its commitment to contesting and winning the upcoming local government elections scheduled for September 21, 2024.
The declaration is coming a few hours after a high court in Abuja lifted the restraining order initially placed on the Kwara State Independent Electoral Commission, KWAISEC.
The court’s decision was based on the expiration of the ex parte order, which, by law, cannot extend beyond 14 days.
Reacting to the development, spokesman of the PDP in the state, Olusegun Olusola Adewara, in a statement in Ilorin, said “While the substantive case challenging the processes of KWASIEC continues, the PDP fully respects the court’s ruling and will proceed with the elections in accordance with the law.
“We are aware that the ruling government has made an attempt to twist this outcome to suit their propaganda and mislead the people.
“We must emphasize that the PDP is not, and has never been, interested in stopping the elections. We have stated this on multiple occasions.
“Our goal is not to stop the elections which we have long agitated for but we are duty bound to ensure that LG elections are conducted freely, fairly, transparently and in accordance with all laid down rules.”
The spokesman said with the court ruling, “the PDP is bound by the decision, and we are ready to compete in the elections with full confidence that the people of Kwara are solidly behind us.
“That said, we are fully aware of the plans and statements from certain quarters within the ruling party regarding their intentions to manipulate the election results.”
He alleged that the party has received reports of the ruling party’s intentions to write results ahead of the elections and prevent election materials from reaching polling units in some areas.
“There are even rumors of pre-thumb printed ballot papers set to be stuffed into boxes on the day of elections,” he added.
The party charged security agencies to swing into action and increase their vigilance around KWASIEC as the council elections approach, asserting that “the integrity of our electoral system must not be allowed to be bastardized by the anti-democracy elements who found themselves in public office.”
The spokesman noted that “while it is clear that trust in the integrity of KWASIEC is at the moment very low, we call on all well-meaning citizens to come out en masse and exercise their right to vote and stand firm by their votes.”
A Makurdi High Court, on Monday, heard a motion filed by Counsel to the All Progressives Congress, APC, Matthew Burkaa, who appeared with Dangana and other Lawyers.
Recall that the court had on the 28th of August 2024, extended the lifespan of the interim order by seven days.
When the case came up on Monday, Counsel for APC, Burkaa SAN filed and served many processes on M.T. Alyebo Esq who appeared with E.E. Igbighogho for Agada and other Applicants.
Despite the service of further affidavit on MT Alyebo in Court, he agreed to take the Motion for setting aside the restraining order.
The main ground of the motion is that the originating motion was not signed and that the interim injunction cannot stand on an unsigned originating motion.
M.T. Alyebo who appeared for the Benue APC chairman, Agada, told the Court that the originating motion was properly signed by S.O.S.Napoleon Esq.
He referred the Court to its copy of the originating motion submitting that it is the Judge’s copy of the motion that will determine whether the process was signed or not adding that once that copy is signed, all other copies remaining unsigned cannot change the situation.
Alyebo submitted that assuming without conceding that the copy of the process exhibited by the SAN was not signed, the case is valid, drawing the court’s attention to the fact that even on that copy brought by the SAN, there is a mark made against the name of S.O.S. Napoleon and that suffices.
He cited the authority of GTB v. INNOSON Nig Ltd where the Supreme Court described the valid signing of a legal process as “a signature or mark against the name of the lawyer or over and above the name of a lawyer ” submitting that the process was validly signed.
Justice Theresa Igoche, after listening to the Counsels adjourned the matter to 10th September, 2024 for ruling.
The 33 council chairmen in Oyo State have dumped the Association of Local Government of Nigeria (ALGON) over the Supreme Court’s judgment granting financial autonomy to local government across the country.
The chairmen, in a communique signed by all the chairmen, unanimously declared their unalloyed support for Governor Seyi Makinde.
ALGON’s Public Relation Officer in the state, Ibrahim Akintayo, described the chairmen’s stand as solidarity to Governor Makinde’s recent stand on local government autonomy as ruled by the apex court.
They attributed their unequivocal loyalty to Makinde for his exemplary leadership and unrivalled achievements since his assumption to office.
LEADERSHIP recalls that the Oyo State’s governor had during a meeting with some stakeholders after the court ruling, constituted committees to review apex court’s ruling on local government autonomy.
“I called this meeting because I felt that even though we have not seen the Certified True Copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court, we have to be proactive and discuss the decision of the Supreme Court as it concerns financial autonomy of the local government councils because I believe a lacuna has been created between the decision and the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that we all swore to uphold.
“The law is the law, and when there is a conflict, yes, we should go to the court. But it behooves on us to look for our own home-grown solutions that can ensure that we have transparency and that our people do not suffer. This is because when two elephants are fighting, it is the grass that will suffer,” the governor had stated.
Makinde’s stand on the Supreme Court ruling had however received mixed reactions from the public with some supporting his stance and others criticising the governor.
According to a communique, the decision to move to a new association was arrived at due to the need to protect and provide for the people in their various local government areas.
It also said that the intended association for local government executive chairmen will be registered under the relevant laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Part of the communique read: “At the general meeting of ALL the Local Government Councils of Oyo State, held on Saturday 3rd August 2024 at Ibadan, it was voluntarily agreed and resolved as follows:
“That in order to inter alia protect the interest of our people, we should forthwith form an umbrella association. Such organisation will be registered under the relevant Laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its membership shall be institutional-represented by the chairmen of respective local government councils.
“That the association shall remain committed to the democratic ideas of the system of Local Government as enshrined in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended).
“Furthermore, the association shall ensure the delivery of the real development in local councils in the overall interest of our people at the local level.”
A Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt has issued a restraining order against the Peoples Democratically Party, PDP, its National Chairman, Iliya Umar Damagum, and National Secretary, Senator Samuel Anyanwu.
The order prohibits the party and its representatives from holding Wards, Local Government Areas and State congresses in Rivers State pending the hearing and determination of a suit filed by bona fide party members from various wards in the 23 local government areas of the state.
Justice Charles Wali, who issued the restraining order, directed the Inspector General of Police, IGP, the Commissioner of Police in Rivers State, the Director-General of the Department of State Services, DSS, and the Nigerian Security and Civil Defence Corps, NSCDC, to enforce this order.
The case has been adjourned to August 1, 2024, for further hearing.
According to report a Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, directed the PDP in Rivers State to proceed with the conduct of its ward, local government, and state congresses.
In his ruling, Justice Peter Lifu barred the DSS, the Police, the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, and seven others from stopping the congresses.
Recall that the congresses are scheduled to elect new officers to run the affairs of the PDP at various levels in Rivers State.
Justice Lifu ordered the PDP to adhere strictly to the provisions of the guidelines and adjusted the timetable and schedule of activities, pending the determination of a motion on notice for an interlocutory injunction filed alongside the motion ex parte.
He further restrained the PDP and three national officers from allowing any person who did not obtain a nomination form or ad hoc form within the stipulated time in the guidelines from running for any elective office or ad hoc or national delegate positions, pending the determination of the motion on notice already filed.
The judge adjourned the case to August 15 for all parties to appear before him for their respective defences.
Prior to this ruling by the Federal High Court, a Rivers State High Court had restrained the PDP, its national chairman, national financial secretary, and national organizing secretary from holding the congress scheduled for July 27, 2024, in Rivers State.
This order was issued by Justice Sobere Hambo in an ex parte application brought by the Caretaker Committee Chairman of Emohua Local Government Area, David Omereji, and 10 others against the defendants.
The Benue State Independent Electoral Commission (BSIEC) has rescheduled the Local Government elections to October 5, 2024.
The election was initially slated for November 16, 2024, after an earlier date of July 6, 2024.
The new date was announced on Wednesday by the Chairman of the Commission, Dr. John Chen, during a meeting with members of the Benue State House of Assembly Standing Committee on Electoral Matters and Civil Society, led by its Chairman, Mr. Abu Umoru, at the Commission’s Headquarters in Makurdi.
Chen, represented by the Commission’s Secretary, Dr. Vincent Gisaor, explained that the change was necessitated by a recent Supreme Court ruling.
He stated, “The Commission is already partnering with relevant stakeholders to ensure the conduct of free, fair, and credible Local Government elections in the state.”
Chen also pointed out some challenges faced by the Commission, including a lack of funds and operational vehicles.
Earlier, the Chairman of the Standing Committee, Mr. Umoru, urged the Commission to organize the Local Government elections promptly, in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling that declared Caretaker Committees at that tier of government illegitimate.
Umoru stated the importance of meeting the deadline set by the apex court for elected Councils to be in place, warning that failure to do so would adversely affect Local Government administration in the state.
The Chairman also called for the unfreezing of the Commission’s accounts to enable the management to access funds necessary for immediate arrangements for the poll.
The Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, IN Kogi State, has accused Governor Usman Ododo and the ruling All Progressives Congress, APC, of plotting to circumvent the Supreme Court’s ruling on Local Government Autonomy.
The state chapter of the party accused “Ododo of planning to install his loyalists as local government chairmen to maintain control over local government accounts.”
In a statement signed by Ibrahim Dansofo, the party claimed that “Ododo’s declaration that the Joint Allocation Account, JAC, is constitutional shows his ignorance of the Supreme Court’s ruling, which abolished JAC.”
The PDP also recalled the era of Yahaya Bello’s administration, where local government chairmen would withdraw funds and deliver them to the government house.
The party alleged that Ododo, as the then Auditor General of Local Government, was complicit in this practice.
PDP claimed it was not surprised at Ododo’s stance on Local Government autonomy, given his past records.
The party accused Ododo of already rigging the upcoming local government election to impose his loyalists and compromise local government authority.
The Edo State House of Assembly, EDHA, has filed an appeal in the judgement by Justice J. K. Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, which overturned the impeachment of the state’s former Deputy Governor, Philip Shaibu.
The lawmakers have also filed a stay of execution on the ruling pending the appeal.
According to report the State Assembly, had on Monday, April 8, 2024, impeached Shaibu sequel to the adoption of the report of the seven-man investigative panel set up by the state Chief Judge to investigate allegations of misconduct against the former deputy governor.
The investigative panel established by the Assembly was headed by Justice S.A. Omonua (retd.) and probed Shaibu on allegations of perjury and leaking of government secrets, ending its sittings with the former Deputy Governor refusing to appear before it.
Shaibu was impeached by the vote of 18 out of 19 members of the Assembly present at plenary while one abstained from the headcount and voting process.
Following Shaibu’s impeachment, Governor Godwin Obaseki picked Omobayo Marvellous as his Deputy to complete his second tenure in office which will end on November 11, 2024.
The Ogunmegbokanle Ruling House of Osi-Ekiti in Ido/Osi local government area of Ekiti State has written the state government demanding for its candidate’s inclusion in the community’s traditional ruler selection process.
The family in a letter addressed to the Ekiti State Governor, Biodun Oyebanji through their Solicitors, Morakinyo Ogele and Co, also requested that the state government officially recognise the family as one of the bonafide ruling houses having right to the throne of Olosi of Osi.
The renewed call for its inclusion as one of the recognised Osi-Ekiti Ruling Houses, according to the family, is sequel to the alleged injustice done to the Ogunmegbokanle Ruling House which dated back to the history.
It lamented that none of the Ogunmegbokanle descendants, as offsprings of a foremost Olosi of Osi-Ekiti has been allowed to ascend the throne of their forefather since his reign long time ago.
An appeal is then made to the state government to add or include Ogunmegbokanle to the existing ruling houses in Osi-Ekiti, and if possible, permit them to provide a candidate in the ongoing selection process since the current oba selected and his family are yet to resolve their differences.
Ekiti State Government is also charged to constitute a chieftaincy panel to confirm the historical record in respect to the history of the town.
The letter reads, “If the stalemate now in Osi Ekiti persists or insisting, the government should solve the problem by inviting our client’s Ruling House to present a candidate for the kingmakers to become Olosi of Osi.
“From the established information, both from the indigenes of Osi and from external source, Ogunmegbokanle left Ile-Ife sometimes in year 1240AD together with his siblings and associates. History revealed although he made a brief sojourn at various towns in Ekiti.
“It is further revealed that Ogunmegbokanle left Ife to unknown destination as a result of denial and betrayal of his elder brother, hence, he left Ife to establish his own kingdom.
“During his journey from Ile-Ife, he moved alongside with other siblings to locate his new place of abode which is Osi-Ekiti. Ogunmegbokanle equally carried all paraphernalia of the office of a king included crown, beads and others which they said has been confirmed by records from the Ooni of Ife.
“When they migrated from Ile-Ife, their port of call was Ifewara where Olukoronfo was made king by his loyalist that migrated with him from Ile-Ife. Still our Ogunmegbokanle was on his match as he left Olukoronfo at Osi-Sooko.
“On his journey, he followed the instruction of Apariko Oracle and proceeded to Efon-Alaye from there to Ogotun-Ekiti, thereafter they left Ogotun-Ekiti for Igbara Odo-Ekiti on the instruction of Apariko Oracle from where they proceeded to Ilawe-Ekiti, still on the instruction of Apariko Oracle.
“According to authentic history, Ogunmegbokanle finally setlled at Osi known and called Osi-Ekiti. Ogunmegbokanle who came with paraphernalia of a king and of who was the most senior among his siblings was crowned as Olosi of Osi-Ekiti thus became the first king of the town, Osi-Ekiti.
“File No 31 of Federal Ministry of Information at Archives, subject Osi (Ado District). Matter affecting Ekiti Division titled Osi Native Improvement Society 16th March 1937 where paragraph 7 reads to wit. “Your excellency the following Obas have reigned with the full authority to wear the crown in Osi – the Ogunmegbokanle who came from Ile-Ife to settle in Osi-Ekiti brought his crown from Ile-Ife.
“At page 23 of this Osi matter, it was stated in paragraph 4 to wit: ‘his honor as again consulted the Oni of Ife who stated that Olosi received a crown from Ife.’ At page 16 of this report quoted above, it was mentioned that the 1st Olosi was Ogunmegbokanle who brought his crown from Ile-Ife.
“Both powerful writers of Ido-Osi in their books confirmed that Ogunmegbokanle founded Osi-Ekiti. See ‘Awon Asa Odun Ati Oye Jije Osi-Ekiti.”
The family premised it’s claim on the history book written by Alabi Benso Abioye from Osi-Ekiti on the page 7 paragraph 3 of the book which was translated into English language.
The book recalled, “Sometimes 700 years ago, history made it known to us that Osi came into existence under the administration of Oba Ogunmegbokanle, and Osi is still existing where it is today.”
The family therefore requests the state government for its due recognition and be accorded the right to produce a candidate to the throne of the Olosi.
Oyo State Governor, Engr Seyi Makinde has declared that the Supreme Court ruling granting financial autonomy to local governments has created a significant gap between judicial and constitutional provisions.
The governor who spoke at an emergency consultative meeting with stakeholders on Monday in Ibadan also announced the formation of technical and legal committees to thoroughly examine the implications of the court’s decision.
The meeting which held at the Executive Chamber of the Governor’s Office was attended by key figures including members of the Oyo State chapter of the Association of Local Government Administration (ALGON), the Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Barrister Abiodun Aikomo, Commissioner for Local Government and Chieftaincy Matters, Otunba Ademola Ojo, and representatives from various unions including the Nigeria Labor Congress (NLC), Trade Union Congress (TUC), Nigeria Union of Local Government Employees (NULGE), and Nigeria Union of Pensioners (NUP).
Makinde highlighted the aim of the gathering to discuss the implications of the Supreme Court ruling regarding the financial autonomy of local government councils.
He emphasised the challenges posed to state governments by the decision, stressing the need for a home-grown solution that ensures transparency and aligns with constitutional principles.
“In addressing the aftermath of this ruling, we must ensure that our actions promote good governance and serve the best interests of our people,” he said.
The Oyo State governor also reflected on his administration’s efforts since assuming office, citing significant strides in local government elections, infrastructure development, and the settlement of salary arrears and pension obligations.
Speaking on the challenges and the way forward, Makinde reiterated his commitment to collaborative efforts with local governments to deliver dividends of democracy effectively.
Meanwhile, Barrister Aikomo and Otunba Ojo, addressing newsmen after the meeting, outlined the responsibilities of the newly formed committees.
They disclosed that the committees have been tasked with reviewing the specifics of the Supreme Court ruling and proposing detailed implementation plans that adhere to constitutional requirements while addressing practical challenges.
The Attorney-General affirmed that the committees are expected to complete their review within four to six weeks, pending the receipt of the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the Supreme Court Judgement.
The Supreme Court ruling, which mandates direct administration of local government funds without interference from state governors, has sparked nationwide debates and legal scrutiny.
“We are determined to navigate these challenges and ensure that the interests of our people remain paramount,” Makinde concluded.